<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bayesian-Optimization on IOPS</title><link>https://iops.gitlabpages.inria.fr/tags/bayesian-optimization/</link><description>Recent content in Bayesian-Optimization on IOPS</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:04:44 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://iops.gitlabpages.inria.fr/tags/bayesian-optimization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Testing IOPS's BO search against random sampling using cached HPC results</title><link>https://iops.gitlabpages.inria.fr/blog/bayesian-optimization-study/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://iops.gitlabpages.inria.fr/blog/bayesian-optimization-study/</guid><description>&lt;p>IOPS can use &lt;a href="https://iops.gitlabpages.inria.fr/user-guide/search-methods/#bayesian-optimization">Bayesian Optimization&lt;/a> when the objective is to find the parameter combination that yields the maximum (or minimum) metric value in a search space. In this article, we decided to test the efficiency of IOPS&amp;rsquo;s BO search by comparing it against IOPS&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="https://iops.gitlabpages.inria.fr/user-guide/search-methods/#random-sampling">random search&lt;/a>. The idea is simple: given a search space, run both IOPS BO and Random, then compare the results to see which one reaches the optimal first. And of course, it should not be a surprise at this point that we used an I/O benchmark to do it.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>